Our current listing
- Cda A. Aah (November 10, 2004 2:51:30 pm)
- That'd be biting if it weren't so damn wrong, Penelope.
- Train Wreck (November 10, 2004 2:05:09 pm)
- I don't believe I compared this site to Stern; I compared your apparent fascination with this site, which you profess to hate, with the fascination Stern haters have for his show.
As for attacks ad hominem, I am certain your latest response has illuminated your skills at criticism and debate more richly than any poor words which I might choose.
- Cda A. Aah (November 10, 2004 10:51:02 am)
- I'm sorry, your understanding of logic must be limited to that which is presented with mellifluous butterfly kisses. Let me explain where you took a turn down Retard Lane, and how you can get back to Bladder Control Boulevard:
1) The "personal attack" to which you refer comes as a single word, "jackass," which I thought was an apt description of anyone who would use such a poor analogy as that which compares this flaccid, unentertaining milquetoast to Howard Stern--who also fails at humor, but does so with a rambunctiousness entirely absent from SayNoToGrampaJoe.com.
2) You don't seem to understand; I have the comments page bookmarked, there's no reason for me to read the rest of the site every time I come here, nor do I ever wish to waste my time in that pursuit. I'm just here for the criticism.
3) This isn't a question of my supporting or taking interest in something I abhor. Rather, criticism is a hobby and argument is a favorite daily pastime.
4) Way to distract from the real issue, Penelope Pitstop.
- Train Wreck (November 10, 2004 12:12:55 am)
- When did attacks ad hominem become a valid form of defending criticism? Didn't you have to revisit the site to find the criticism? There's nothing wrong with admitting you have a morbid fascination with something you don't really like. Steve Guttenberg made a lot of movies and someone must have watched them.
- Cda A. Aah (November 9, 2004 10:16:51 pm)
- I assure you, I only read the site once. It's not hypocritical to respond to criticism, jackass, airtight as your case may have seemed.
- Train Wreck (November 9, 2004 3:52:40 pm)
- Is that your story CDA? It looks like you not only spent about 45 minutes thinking about this site the other night but you came back for more... This is like one of those "people who like Howard Stern listen for 10 minutes, people who don't listen for 20 minutes" things, right?
- Cda A. Aah (November 9, 2004 10:40:30 am)
- Awesome rebuttal, Dave. Are you planning to "bunch" me in the throat for an encore?
- Nowaware (November 8, 2004 5:28:02 pm)
- Many said it was not a child's book, and the first movie just candy coated the evil.
Thank you for your important work. The first blow has been struck.
- david lopan (November 8, 2004 2:57:56 pm)
- Cda A. Aah is a douche.
- Colby (November 7, 2004 2:23:33 am)
- Can someone please explain why a war is being waged against a fictional character? Don't you think that's slightly ridiculous? What do you hope to achieve, if infact, you are as serious about this as you claim to be? Stories will still be told, and movies will still be seen. Besides, it seems to me like you're grasping for straws. It's a movie, take a deep breath and let it go...
< Previous page Next page >
Sign the Book
